Peer Review

After the presentation on thursday, it was really impressive to see everyone's fabrications, which have improved so much.
Just a a few thoughts on each teams Strengths and weakness's

Digilism:

Strengths: The building they choose was not a traditional sky scraper and that brought a sense of intrigue, to actually what is the function of this particular structure?

Weakness: The spaces within the building should have been further developed and the audience was not sure of the scale of the building as such. Even though they had produced a city, but we cannot judge scale from an aerial view.


Orange:

Strengths:The building is an interesting choice, the AI and the sense of scale was exemplified well as we were able to see the interior of the structure and judge for ourselves.The lighting also was integral to the building, as it showed the texture of the exterior of the building at night.

Weakness:I think the map of the city could have been more similar to the original as they are using a real city, im sure shanghai must be more lively than what they portrayed.

Urbans:

Strengths: The space is unique and has been much improved since the last time they presented.

Weakness: Some elements outside the building looked out of place and its integral they use A.I to give a sense of space, scale and time.

Omega:

Strengths: They had a lot of info for the external environment, which they capitalised on.

Weaknesses: They could have improed on the internal feature of the building.


Atlar:

Strengths:The model itself and the site placement is excellent.


Weaknesses: The rooms within the house look a bit bare and this can be further improved, by just adjusting the furniture.